07 August 2018
02 July 2018
The Liberal War Against Coffee
Recently I posted a brief commentary on Arwa Mahdawi's article, "Iced coffee is ruining the environment and your body". As it turns out the Brits conducted a study on a half million people, and can you guess the result? It's good for you! That's right! Fresh grounds for coffee: Study show it may boost longevity.
Of course, Mahdawi's article was posted to The Guardian, so what can you expect from a lopsided, liberal publication? They are not concerned about facts, or even care what other studies have to say. It's one thing to have an opinion or to write an editorial, but it's quite another to make argument seem like fact with nothing to back it up. It's just mere opinion and nothing more.
So big deal, right? Why waste time talking about it? People will enjoy their coffee no matter what. My problem is the "save the planet people" have inculcated their doctrine in almost everything we read. For example, instead of reporting about our wonderful planet and its crazy little critters, the National Geographic in nearly every article has to throw in about how "climate change" is destroying everything.
It's same the everywhere whether it's Popular Mechanics, Time Magazine, Better Homes, People, or Reader's Digest. The News outlets are even worse. The problem is you might think because so many publications seem to be on board that most people around the world believe this garbage. I'm waiting for the day when they try to convince us how global warming is warping outer space, or creating a black hole which will eventually suck our entire planet into oblivion.
So here's the moral of the story. Don't worry about the planet, the planet will take care of itself. You have enough problems for the day -- so eat, drink your coffee, and be happy.
Of course, Mahdawi's article was posted to The Guardian, so what can you expect from a lopsided, liberal publication? They are not concerned about facts, or even care what other studies have to say. It's one thing to have an opinion or to write an editorial, but it's quite another to make argument seem like fact with nothing to back it up. It's just mere opinion and nothing more. So big deal, right? Why waste time talking about it? People will enjoy their coffee no matter what. My problem is the "save the planet people" have inculcated their doctrine in almost everything we read. For example, instead of reporting about our wonderful planet and its crazy little critters, the National Geographic in nearly every article has to throw in about how "climate change" is destroying everything.
It's same the everywhere whether it's Popular Mechanics, Time Magazine, Better Homes, People, or Reader's Digest. The News outlets are even worse. The problem is you might think because so many publications seem to be on board that most people around the world believe this garbage. I'm waiting for the day when they try to convince us how global warming is warping outer space, or creating a black hole which will eventually suck our entire planet into oblivion.
So here's the moral of the story. Don't worry about the planet, the planet will take care of itself. You have enough problems for the day -- so eat, drink your coffee, and be happy.
21 June 2018
Charles Hodge: the forgotten theologian
Charles Hodge may not be forgotten by some, but it's been a long time since I have dabbled in his Systematic Theology. Sometimes I think I am more sure of the divine origin of the Bible than I am of my own salvation. No one who gives Scripture an honest read can say it's just another book or just stories and fairy tales. It has a power of its own precisely because it is from God.
Here's a quote from Hodge's Systematic Theology:
First, All truth must be consistent. God cannot contradict himself. He cannot force us by the constitution of the nature which He has given us to believe one thing, and in his Word command us to believe the opposite. And, second, All the truths taught by the constitution of our nature or by religious experience, are recognized and authenticated in the Scriptures. This is a safeguard and a limit. We cannot assume this or that principle to be intuitively true, or this or that conclusion to be demonstrably certain, and make them a standard to which the Bible must conform. What is self-evidently true, must be proved to be so, and is always recognized in the Bible as true. Whole systems of theologies are founded upon intuitions, so called, and if every man is at liberty to exalt his own intuitions, as men are accustomed to call their strong convictions, we should have as many theologies in the world as there are thinkers.
Hodge, C. (1997). Systematic theology (Vol. 1, p. 15). Oak Harbor, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc.
Here's a quote from Hodge's Systematic Theology:
First, All truth must be consistent. God cannot contradict himself. He cannot force us by the constitution of the nature which He has given us to believe one thing, and in his Word command us to believe the opposite. And, second, All the truths taught by the constitution of our nature or by religious experience, are recognized and authenticated in the Scriptures. This is a safeguard and a limit. We cannot assume this or that principle to be intuitively true, or this or that conclusion to be demonstrably certain, and make them a standard to which the Bible must conform. What is self-evidently true, must be proved to be so, and is always recognized in the Bible as true. Whole systems of theologies are founded upon intuitions, so called, and if every man is at liberty to exalt his own intuitions, as men are accustomed to call their strong convictions, we should have as many theologies in the world as there are thinkers.
Hodge, C. (1997). Systematic theology (Vol. 1, p. 15). Oak Harbor, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc.
15 June 2018
Artificial Intelligence - the new prophet
This creepy AI can predict your next move minutes in advance. Creepy AI
03 June 2018
2001: A Space Odessey - Ending Explained
The first time I saw 2001: A Space Odyssey I was in my teens. I had no idea what the heck was going on except it had something to do with a mysterious "black rectangle", and a couple guys in space with a super computer named Hal that malfunctioned. Now that I'm older I still don't know what it's about. This short video does give us a little insight, but I think for most of us it still doesn't quite fit our idea of how a story should end.
27 May 2018
Ireland's "yes" Voters Celebrate a "Leap Forward?
Sanctioned Homicide
Abortion is murder plain and simple. I want you to take a look at these pathetic, ignorant fools celebrating death.
Photos: CNN
Abortion is murder plain and simple. I want you to take a look at these pathetic, ignorant fools celebrating death.
Photos: CNN
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
The Real Villains of Climate Change
For a while there I thought my addiction to that wonderful brew, coffee, was the real felon in global warming. After all, my coffee maker ...
-
I haven’t seen it lately, but this meme was one of the favorites circulated on fb by so called “Freethinkers” and Atheist. Whoeve...
-
January 27, 2013 I came across an article on how Facebook causes envy. It was a study conducted by two German universities. One caus...
-
Reflections on Francis Schaeffer and The God Who Is There Writer’s Note All I know about Francis Schaeffer is what I remember from The...




